首页> 外文OA文献 >Alternatives, and adjuncts, to prophylactic platelet transfusion for people with haematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation
【2h】

Alternatives, and adjuncts, to prophylactic platelet transfusion for people with haematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation

机译:接受密集化疗或干细胞移植的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的预防性血小板输注的替代方案和辅助措施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Platelet transfusions are used in modern clinical practice to prevent and treat bleeding in people with thrombocytopenia. Although considerable advances have been made in platelet transfusion therapy since the mid-1970s, some areas continue to provoke debate especially concerning the use of prophylactic platelet transfusions for the prevention of thrombocytopenic bleeding. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether agents that can be used as alternatives, or adjuncts, to platelet transfusions for people with haematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation are safe and effective at preventing bleeding. SEARCH METHODS: We searched 11 bibliographic databases and four ongoing trials databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2016, Issue 4), MEDLINE (OvidSP, 1946 to 19 May 2016), Embase (OvidSP, 1974 to 19 May 2016), PubMed (e-publications only: searched 19 May 2016), ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization (WHO) ICTRP and the ISRCTN Register (searched 19 May 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials in people with haematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation who were allocated to either an alternative to platelet transfusion (artificial platelet substitutes, platelet-poor plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, recombinant activated factor VII, desmopressin (DDAVP), or thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics) or a comparator (placebo, standard care or platelet transfusion). We excluded studies of antifibrinolytic drugs, as they were the focus of another review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors screened all electronically derived citations and abstracts of papers identified by the review search strategy. Two review authors assessed risk of bias in the included studies and extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 16 eligible trials. Four trials are ongoing and two have been completed but the results have not yet been published (trial completion dates: April 2012 to February 2017). Therefore, the review included 10 trials in eight references with 554 participants. Six trials (336 participants) only included participants with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing intensive chemotherapy, two trials (38 participants) included participants with lymphoma undergoing intensive chemotherapy and two trials (180 participants) reported participants undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Men and women were equally well represented in the trials. The age range of participants included in the trials was from 16 years to 81 years. All trials took place in high-income countries. The manufacturers of the agent sponsored eight trials that were under investigation, and two trials did not report their source of funding.No trials assessed artificial platelet substitutes, fibrinogen concentrate, recombinant activated factor VII or desmopressin.Nine trials compared a TPO mimetic to placebo or standard care; seven of these used pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and differentiation factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) and two used recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO).One trial compared platelet-poor plasma to platelet transfusion.We considered that all the trials included in this review were at high risk of bias and meta-analysis was not possible in seven trials due to problems with the way data were reported.We are very uncertain whether TPO mimetics reduce the number of participants with any bleeding episode (odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 1.62, one trial, 120 participants, very low quality evidence). We are very uncertain whether TPO mimetics reduce the risk of a life-threatening bleed after 30 days (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.06 to 33.14, three trials, 209 participants, very low quality evidence); or after 90 days (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 16.37, one trial, 120 participants, very low quality evidence). We are very uncertain whether TPO mimetics reduce platelet transfusion requirements after 30 days (mean difference -3.00 units, 95% CI -5.39 to -0.61, one trial, 120 participants, very low quality evidence). No deaths occurred in either group after 30 days (one trial, 120 participants, very low quality evidence). We are very uncertain whether TPO mimetics reduce all-cause mortality at 90 days (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.24 to 4.20, one trial, 120 participants, very low quality evidence). No thromboembolic events occurred for participants treated with TPO mimetics or control at 30 days (two trials, 209 participants, very low quality evidence). We found no trials that looked at: number of days on which bleeding occurred, time from randomisation to first bleed or quality of life.One trial with 18 participants compared platelet-poor plasma transfusion with platelet transfusion. We are very uncertain whether platelet-poor plasma reduces the number of participants with any bleeding episode (OR 16.00, 95% CI 1.32 to 194.62, one trial, 18 participants, very low quality evidence). We are very uncertain whether platelet-poor plasma reduces the number of participants with severe or life-threatening bleeding (OR 4.00, 95% CI 0.56 to 28.40, one trial, 18 participants, very low quality evidence). We found no trials that looked at: number of days on which bleeding occurred, time from randomisation to first bleed, number of platelet transfusions, all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to determine if platelet-poor plasma or TPO mimetics reduce bleeding for participants with haematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. To detect a decrease in the proportion of participants with clinically significant bleeding from 12 in 100 to 6 in 100 would require a trial containing at least 708 participants (80% power, 5% significance). The six ongoing trials will provide additional information about the TPO mimetic comparison (424 participants) but this will still be underpowered to demonstrate this level of reduction in bleeding. None of the included or ongoing trials include children. There are no completed or ongoing trials assessing artificial platelet substitutes, fibrinogen concentrate, recombinant activated factor VII or desmopressin in people undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies.
机译:背景:血小板输注被用于现代临床实践中,以预防和治疗血小板减少症患者的出血。尽管自1970年代中期以来,血小板输注治疗取得了长足的进步,但某些领域仍引起争议,尤其是关于使用预防性血小板输注预防血小板减少性出血的争论。目的:确定可作为替代药物或替代药物的血液稀释剂,用于接受密集化疗或干细胞移植的血液恶性肿瘤患者的输血是否安全有效。搜索方法:我们搜索了11个书目数据库和4个进行中的试验数据库,包括Cochrane对照试验中央注册簿(CENTRAL,2016,第4期),MEDLINE(OvidSP,1946至2016年5月19日),Embase(OvidSP,1974至2016年5月19日) ),PubMed(仅限电子出版物:2016年5月19日搜索),ClinicalTrials.gov,世界卫生组织(WHO)ICTRP和ISRCTN注册(2016年5月19日搜索)。选择标准:我们纳入了接受强化化疗或干细胞移植的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的随机对照试验,这些患者被分配用于替代血小板输注(人工血小板替代品,贫血小板血浆,纤维蛋白原浓缩物,重组活化因子VII,去氨加压素( DDAVP)或血小板生成素(TPO)模拟物或比较剂(安慰剂,标准护理或血小板输注)。我们排除了抗纤溶药物的研究,因为它们是另一篇评论的重点。数据收集和分析:两位评论作者筛选了所有以电子方式获得的引文和由评论搜索策略识别的论文摘要。两位评价作者评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险,并独立提取了数据。主要结果:我们确定了16个合格的试验。正在进行四项试验,两项已经完成,但结果尚未公布(试验完成日期:2012年4月至2017年2月)。因此,本综述包括554名参与者的8篇参考文献中的10项试验。六项试验(336名参与者)仅包括接受强化化疗的急性髓细胞性白血病参与者,两项试验(38名参与者)包括接受强化化疗的淋巴瘤参与者,两项试验(180名参与者)报告了接受异体干细胞移植的参与者。男女在试验中的代表均相同。试验中参与者的年龄范围为16岁至81岁。所有试验都在高收入国家进行。该制剂的制造商赞助了八项正在研究的试验,两项试验未报告其资金来源;无试验评估人造血小板替代品,血纤蛋白原浓缩物,重组活化因子VII或去氨加压素;九项试验将TPO模拟物与安慰剂或安慰剂进行比较。标准护理;其中有7个使用了聚乙二醇化的重组人巨核细胞生长和分化因子(PEG-rHuMGDF),还有2个使用了重组人的血小板生成素(rhTPO)。一项试验将贫血小板血浆与血小板输注进行了比较。我们认为该评价中包括的所有试验均在由于报告数据的方式存在问题,因此在7个试验中不可能有较高的偏倚和荟萃分析风险。我们非常不确定TPO模拟物是否会减少出血事件的参与者人数(几率(OR)0.40,95%置信区间(CI)0.10至1.62,一项试验,120名参与者,证据质量非常低)。我们非常不确定TPO模拟物是否会降低30天后威胁生命的出血的风险(OR 1.46,95%CI 0.06至33.14,三项试验,209名参与者,非常低的质量证据);或90天后(OR 1.00,95%CI 0.06至16.37,一项试验,120名参与者,证据质量非常低)。我们非常不确定TPO模拟物是否会在30天后降低血小板输注量(平均差异-3.00单位,95%CI -5.39至-0.61,一项试验,120名参与者,证据质量很低)。 30天后,两组均未发生死亡(一项试验,120名参与者,证据质量很低)。我们不确定TPO模拟物能否降低90天的全因死亡率(OR 1.00,95%CI 0.24至4.20,一项试验,120名参与者,证据质量很低)。在30天时,接受TPO模拟或对照治疗的参与者没有发生血栓栓塞事件(两项试验,209名参与者,证据质量很低)。我们没有发现可用于研究的试验:出血发生的天数,从随机分组到首次出血的时间或生活质量。一项有18名参与者的试验比较了贫血小板血浆输注与血小板输注。我们非常不确定贫血小板血浆是否会减少发生任何出血事件的人数(或16.00,95%CI 1.32至194.62,一项试验,18名参与者,非常低的质量证据)。我们非常不确定贫血小板血浆是否会减少严重出血或危及生命的参与者的人数(OR 4.00,95%CI 0.56至28.40,一项试验,18名参与者,证据质量很低)。我们没有发现可以观察的试验:出血发生的天数,从随机分组到第一次出血的时间,血小板输注的次数,全因死亡率,血栓栓塞事件或生活质量。作者的结论:尚无足够的证据确定贫血的血浆或TPO模拟物是否能降低接受强力化疗或干细胞移植的血液系统恶性肿瘤参与者的出血。要检测具有临床重大出血事件的参与者的比例从100中的12减少到100中的6,需要进行至少708名参与者的试验(80%功效,5%显着性)。正在进行的六项试验将提供有关TPO模拟比较的更多信息(424名参与者),但仍不足以证明这种程度的出血减少。纳入或正在进行的试验均未包含儿童。尚无完成或正在进行的试验评估接受密集化疗或干细胞移植的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中的人工血小板替代品,纤维蛋白原浓缩物,重组活化因子VII或去氨加压素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号